![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
July 2006 |
Issue 7 Volume 4 |
|||||||||||||
|
On-Site Construction Recycling Inspector’s Corner Fiberglass insulation is the most popular and commonly used insulation in new construction. Fiberglass is an appealing option due to low cost and lack of complicated installation equipment. Sprayers, compressors, or heaters are unnecessary. Additionally, there is no waiting period for the insulation to dry before installing the drywall. Foam insulation has a better R-value per inch than fiberglass and is not affected in hot walls exposed to extreme attic temperatures. The foam insulation has no voids, gaps, or misalignments when it expands. As the insulation expands, it fills the wall cavities completely and eliminates the need to spend extra time cutting around wires, pipes, and electrical boxes. Another benefit of foam insulation is that it acts as an air sealer to the exterior walls when applied directly. Now let’s examine the drawbacks of these two insulation products… Fiberglass installers are not always adequately trained in proper installation procedures. In many of the homes I have inspected, insulation is compressed in the walls, gaps are present around wires and pipes, and voids are present behind kitchen cabinet blocking. Each of these items reduces the effective R-value of insulation. For example, if the R-value of insulation is rated at R-13, but the aforementioned mistakes are present, the R-value may potentially decrease to R-9. Gaps, voids and compression all contribute to interior discomfort for the homeowner. Insulation installers are often paid by contract, which may result in less time spent cutting around wires and pipes. The common wall of an attached garage is also especially vulnerable to the elements during construction. In many recently insulated new homes, wind can blow through the unfinished structure and pull insulation away from the walls on the windward side of the home. From a cost perspective, foam insulation is generally more expensive than fiberglass. The cost of foam can be twice as much as fiberglass in some applications. The contractor must have sprayers, heaters, and usually a trailer with a compressor to apply the foam. Sometimes a contractor’s equipment fails on the job site and they must return the following day when the equipment has been serviced. Another factor to consider is that foam insulation requires an “off-gassing” period to allow the combination of chemicals to dissipate before occupancy. In conclusion, there is no clear-cut answer as to which insulation is best. Both of these products are great but, I believe that there are many factors to consider when determining which one to use. If cost is not an issue, foam insulation will yield the desired R-value, but correctly installed fiberglass will have similar results and cost less. The trick is making sure the fiberglass is installed correctly by trained professionals - the first time. For more information, please call GWS @ 1-888-488-0206 Announcements: Home Energy Rater Training
For more information, please contact us at GWS (405)-946-0206 or email bwelch@gwssi.com EEBA Excellence in Building
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||